CNN reported on a recent Wikileaks document release that alleges an affair between Moammar Gadhafi and his nurse, which they characterized as ‘voluptuous’. Then the article proceeded to comment on his eccentric behavior regarding flying. Also, the French President was called “Challenging partner”. Some argued that the information was diplomatically embarrassing.
The two rights here are: 1. It is right to let the public know the truth, and 2. It is right to maintain the dignity of those you are reporting on.
The purpose of Wikileaks is to publish and comment on leaked documents that allege government and corporate misconduct.
Yet, this article seems to be mere observations and opinions of character not factual records of misconduct.
While this information may be interesting, it is not necessary or pivotal in regulating governmental misconduct. The information is defamatory and not only diminishes respect for the people being commented on, but is also weakens the credibility of Wikileaks as a source.
It is this type of information being published that leads to Iranian President Ahmadinejad to say that Wikileaks information is ‘unvaluable’. He describes the site as propaganda and psychological warfare ‘games’.
1 comment:
Very good description of the "two rights" involved in this ethical problem.
Post a Comment