A few years ago, when my school district came out with the media consent forms, I was really impressed. I thought wow, we are really on the ball. They even had us sign consent forms for showing artwork made by the children. After starting my ethics class and seeing how the PR department works, I am not so sure. I still think its great that we have consent forms for the kids and of course, it keeps us legal. But shouldn't we get consent from everyone? Okay, I can understand public dignitaries, like the judge and the founder, because they put themselves in the public eye and it was an event centered around them. I am an employee so maybe she has my permission by default. In addition, I actually knew the photographer, so I was cool with her snapping my photo. The only hang up I have is with the parents. What if they did not want their picture to be public? For what ever reason, shouldn't they had the right to consent?
 I believe that the school district was in the right in this instance. They got written consent from the minors and non verbal consent from the adults. As they had the right to say, I would not like my picture taken. Also, when they signed for their children, they were informed of how the media would be used. I know, I might have made a big deal out of nothing, but I think I learned a little bit about everyday ethics of PR in my field.
 
 
2 comments:
Good thought process or beginning stages of moral reasoning there!
Wow! You must already know that you are going to obtain some pretty explosive information. Normally, I would not go through this range of possibilities when beginning a story unless I already had a source who has provided me with info. You've raised good questions. Another question to ponder is the motivation or agenda of sources in providing you the information. Explosive or damaging information sometimes serves a hidden agenda.
Post a Comment